Unefficiency Settlement Of Fintech Lending Disputes And How Legal Framework To Settle It: Indonesia Perspective

Authors

  • SENO WIBOWO GUMBIRA
  • DHIANA PUSPITAWATI
  • KUKUH TEJOMURTI

Keywords:

Fintech Lending, Dispute resolution, Inefficiency

Abstract

This article aims to analyze fintech lending dispute resolution's inefficiency and how the ideal concept is to realize the principle of user dispute resolution under the Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 77 / POJK.01 / 2016. The research method used is prescriptive normative legal research using primary and secondary legal materials. According to POJK 77 / POJK.01 / 2016, the results show that dispute resolution on the lending and borrowing services based on the information technology should be done quickly and cheaply. However, there is still no effective and efficient dispute resolution institution established in practice because fintech lending administrators in the standard e-contract clause directly determine one court, which may be very far from the parties' place (lender or borrower). Besides, there is no clear mechanism related to dispute resolution for Fintech Lending users, so Fintech Lending Organizers do not have different guidelines for resolving disputes that result in Fintech Lending Organizers. The complicated mechanism and complexity of resolving fintech lending disputes are not proportional to the loan value, which may be less than the dispute resolution process's cost. The Financial Services Authority must establish an online alternative Dispute Resolution Agency so that the parties can be effective and efficient in resolving disputes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aldi Firmansyah Rubini, et al.2017. “Kajian Perlindungan Konsumen Sektor Jasa Keuangan”. Departemen Perlindungan Konsumen Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Jakarta

Edmon Makarim. “Pengantar Hukum Telematika, Suatu Kompilasi Kajian di dalam Kontrak Elektronik (E- Contract) dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia”. Gloria Juris, Vol.8, No. 1.

Ekaterina Kalmykova, Anna Ryabova. 15 Juni 2016. "Fintech Market Development Perspectives." SHS Web of Conference. Vol 28.

Iswi Hariyani dan Cita Yustisia Serfiyani. 2016, “Perlindungan Hukum bagi Nasabah Kecil dalam Proses Adjudikasi di Industri Jasa Keuangan”, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol.13, Nomor 4.

Posner, Richard A. Economic Analysis of Law( Ed. 4). Boston: Little Brown & Company, 1992

Timothy R. Lyman, G. I. 2006. Use of Agents in Branchless Banking for the Poor: Rewards, Risk and Regulation. World: Focus Note, 38.

Winda Rizky Febrina., et al. 2014. "Efektivitas dan Efisiensi Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) sebagai Salah Satu Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis di Indonesia." Privat Law. Vol. 2. Nomor 4. Surakarta

Downloads

Published

2021-04-30

How to Cite

GUMBIRA, S. W. ., PUSPITAWATI, D. ., & TEJOMURTI, K. . (2021). Unefficiency Settlement Of Fintech Lending Disputes And How Legal Framework To Settle It: Indonesia Perspective. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(2), 4021–4024. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/1309

Issue

Vol. 27 No. 2 (2021): The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Section

Articles

License

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.