What makes the Technology Strategic Decision Making More Well- organized?

Authors

  • Sayad Fayaz Ahmad
  • Talal M. Alasmari

Keywords:

Intelligence, Experience, Information, Organizational Capabilities and Strategic Decision making.

Abstract

The study aims to find out the factors which have a strong impact on technology-related decisions making. After a deep literature review, various factors that have a great influence on decision making were found out. These are experience, intelligence, information availability, and organizational capabilities. The research is based on a review of literature related to the subject and its analysis. It recommends that for making strategically suitable decisions, the decision-makers should have attributes like individual experience, intelligence, and availability of information and capabilities of the organizations to make suitable decisions. The study adds a much clear picture of the elements and their association with technology decision making. And can be used for the development of a decision- making model for any technology industry during high uncertainty.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

F. Ahmad, M.K. Shahid and A. S. Syed. (2020).Role of Knowledge Management in Strategically Suitable Decision Making Telecommunication Sector. Pakistan Business Review, Vol 22 Issue 1.

Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Verdegay, J. L. (1996a). Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 79(2), 175– 190.

Mosleh, A., Bier, V. M., & Apostolakis, G. (1987). Methods for the elicitation and use of expert opinion in risk assessment. Phase I – A critical evaluation and directions for future research. Report no. NuREG/CR-4962.

Wheeler, T. A., Hora, S. C., Cramond, W. R., & Unwin, S. D. (1989). Analysis of core damage frequency from internal events: Expert judgment elicitation. Report no. NUREG/CR- 4550, Vol 2, SAND-86-2084. Washington, DC, USA: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Cook, W., & Kress, M. (1985). Ordinal ranking with intensity of preference. Management Science, 31, 26–32.

Lai, V. S., Wong, B. K., & Cheung, W. (2002). Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: A case using the AHP in software selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 137, 34–144.

Kuncheva, L. I., & Krishnapuram, R. (1996). A fuzzy consensus aggregation operator. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 79, 347–356.

Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., & Chiclana, F. (2002). A consensus model for multi person decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics A, 32, 394–402.

Compare various contemporary definitions given in the OED (2nd edition, 1989).

Levitt, Heidi M. (1999). "The Development of Wisdom: An Analysis of Tibetan Buddhist Experience". Journal of Humanistic Psychology 39 (2): 86–105.

Popper, Karl R.; Eccles, John C. (1977). The self and its brain. Berlin: Springer International. p. 425. ISBN 3-540-08307-3.

Christensen, Scott M.; Turner, Dale R. (1993). Folk psychology and the philosophy of mind. Routledge. p. xxi. ISBN 978-0-8058-0931-2.

Blumin, Stuart M. (1989). The emergence of the middle class: social experience in the American city, 1760-1900. Interdisciplinary perspectives on modern history. Cambridge University Press. p. 434. ISBN 978-0-521-37612-9.

Brown, Nina W. (2003) [1998]. Psycho educational groups: process and practice (2 ed.). Rout ledge. p. 103. ISBN 978-0-415-94602-5.

Nowotny, Helga; Plaice, Neville (1996). Time: The Modern and Postmodern Experience. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 192. ISBN 978-0-7456-1837-1.

Madjar, N., Oldham, G. R., and Pratt, M. G. 2002. "Theres no place like home?: The contributions of work and non-work sources of creativity support to employees creative performance", Academy of Management Journal, Vol 45, pp. 757-767.

Enhancing Service Experience through Understanding Employee Experience Management.

Gottfredson, Linda S. (1997). "Mainstream Science on Intelligence (editorial)".

Intelligence 24: 13–23. ISSN 0160-2896.

Neisser, U.; Boodoo, G.; Bouchard Jr, T.J.; Boykin, A.W.; Brody, N.; Ceci, S.J.; Halpern, D.F.; Loehlin, J.C.; Perloff, R.; Sternberg, R.J.; Others, (1998). "Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns". Annual Progress in Child Psychiatry and Child Development 1997. ISBN 978-0-87630-870-7.

Wechsler, D (1944). The measurement of adult intelligence. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins. ISBN 0-19-502296-3.

Humphreys, L. G. (1979). "The construct of general intelligence". Intelligence 3 (2): 105–120.

Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books. 1993. ISBN 0-465-02510-2.

Feuerstein, R., Feuerstein, S., Falik, L & Rand, Y. (1979; 2002). Dynamic assessments of cognitive modifiability. ICELP Press, Jerusalem: Israel; Feuerstein, R. (1990). The theory of structural modifiability. In B. Presseisen (Ed.), Learning and thinking styles: Classroom interaction. Washington, DC: National Education Associations.

Dosi, G. (1988) „Sources, Procedures and Micro-economic Effects of Innovation‟,

Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 1126–71.

Dosi, G., R. R. Nelson, and S. G. Winter (2000) „Introduction: The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities‟, in G. Dosi, R. R. Nelson, and S. G. Winter (eds.), The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–22.

Teece, D. J. (1992) „Competition, cooperation, and innovation: Organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress‟, in Managerial and Decision Economics 10 (Spring, Special Issue), 1–25.

March, James G. (1991) „Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning‟

Organization Science, 2, 71–87.

The Power of Information Availabity, What Every Senior Executive Should Know* Recovering Business Value from Unprofitable Downtime * Includes Worksheets for Business Process and IT Process Evaluation. White paper.

Hole, Y., & Snehal, P. & Bhaskar, M. (2018). Service marketing and quality strategies. Periodicals of engineering and natural sciences,6 (1), 182-196.

“Designing for High Availability,” DM Review

Nicolett, M., Andren, E., & Gilbert, M. (2000)

Porter, Michael E. (1996)

(Kvint, Vladimir (2009)

(NEDRIX survey, Purdue University, CRM project).

Yogesh Hole et al 2019 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1362 012121

James Reason (1990). Human Error. Ashgate. ISBN 1-84014-104-2.

Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky (2000). Choice, Values, Frames. The Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-62172-0.

Doya, Kenji; Michael N Shadlen (2012). "Decision Making". Current Opinion in Neurobiology 22 (6): 911–913.

Schacter, Gilbert, Wegner (2011). Psychology. Worth. p. 369.

Kutty, Ambalika D., and Himanshu Kumar Shee. "Too much info!" Monash Business Review 3.3 (2007): 8+. Academic One File. Web. 3 Mar. 2013.

Quoted sentenced said by Paul Saffo; website written by John Foley. "Managing Information: Infoglut". Retrieved 2013-04-19.

Schacter, Gilbert, Wegner (2011). Psychology. Worth. pp. 368–370.

Sayed Fayaz Ahmad, (2019). Knowledge Management as a Pre-requisite of Innovation in Public Sector Organization, Indian Journal of Natural Sciences. ISSN: 0976- 0997, Vol.9. Issue 52, Feb 2019.

SF Ahmad, MK Shahid, (2015). Impact of Knowledge Management on Security of Information and its Strategic Outcomes. Information and Knowledge Management ISSN 2224-5758 (Paper) ISSN 2224-896X (Online) Vol.5, No.1, 2015.

Samia Nadeem, Masood Hasan, S.F. Ahmad (2021).Factors Influencing Knowledge Sharing in the Workplace for Strategic Competitive Advantage. International Journal of Business, Economics and Finance, Issue 2(1).

S.F. Ahmad, M.K. Shahid and A. S. Syed. (2020).Role of Knowledge Management in Strategically Suitable Decision Making Telecommunication Sector. Pakistan Business Review, Vol 22 Issue 1.

SF Ahmad, MK Shahid, (2015). Role of Knowledge Management in Achieving Customer Relationship and its Strategic Outcomes. Information and Knowledge Management. ISSN 2224-5758 (Paper) ISSN 2224-896X (Online) Vol.5, No.1, 2015.

Rasheed, I Subhan, M Ibrahim, SF Ahmed, (2015). Knowledge Management as a Strategy & Competitive Advantage: A Strong Influence to Success, a Survey of Knowledge Management Case Studies of Different Organizations. Information and Knowledge Management ISSN 2224-5758 (Paper) ISSN 2224-896X (Online) Vol.5, No.8, 2015.

SF Ahmad, MK Shahid, (2015). Factors Influencing the Process of Decision Making in Telecommunication Sector. European Journal of Business and Management ISSN 2222- 1905 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2839 (Online) Vol.7, No.1, 2015 .

M Ibrahim, MK Shahid, SF Ahmed, (2014). Impact of Telecom Services Characteristics on Consumer for Use in Pakistan, Advances in Economics and Business (AEB) 2(4): 172-179, 2014.

M Ibrahim, MK Shahid, SF. Ahmad (2015). Impact of Risk and Ethics on Adoption of Mobile Banking in Pakistan, Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development ISSN 2222-1700 (Paper) ISSN 2222-2855 (Online) Vol.6, No.7, 2015.

Y Khan, S.F. Ahmad, Z Mehmood, MK Shahid, M Ibrahim, (2012). Analysis of Consumer Perception towards Telecommunication Services, Journal of Social and Development Sciences (JSDS). Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 89-98, Mar 2012 (ISSN 2221-1152).

Sayed Fayaz Ahmad, (2012). Knowledge Management: Factors Influencing Successful Innovation, Information and Knowledge Management. ISSN 2224-5758 (Paper)

ISSN 2224-896X (Online) Vol.2, No.4, 2012

Sayed Fayaz Ahmad, (2011). The Role of Decision Maker in Designing a Political Party Strategy (Evidence from Pakistan). Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization. ISSN 2224-3240 (Paper) ISSN 2224-3259 (Online) Vol.1, 2011.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-30

How to Cite

Ahmad, S. F. ., & Alasmari, T. M. . (2021). What makes the Technology Strategic Decision Making More Well- organized?. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(2), 2172–2182. Retrieved from https://cibgp.com/au/index.php/1323-6903/article/view/1122

Issue

Vol. 27 No. 2 (2021): The journal of contemporary issues in business and government

Section

Articles

License

You are free to:

  1. Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
  2. Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.