A FREE-MARKET PERSPECTIVE FOR THE PREPARERS AND USERS OF FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING INFORMATION TODAY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61841/cibg.v12i1.10Abstract
This paper explores both academic and professional literature, published over the past few decades, addressing the proliferation of accounting standards and the imposition and increasing burden that has been placed upon the preparers of financial reporting information. The 'pro' argument for increased reporting regulation and disclosure has been the protection of stakeholders; however, recent experiences suggest that this approach has not been entirely successful. A significant number of unexpected corporate collapses have continued to occur. The suggestion is made that, in addition to improved corporate governance and regulation, the interests of stakeholders may be better served through efforts to promote a culture of ethical conduct within the wider business community.
Downloads
References
Anonymous (1973) The accounting scene. Cost and Management, 47 (6) p 44. (Retrieved: 22 April2006fromABI/INFORMGlobaldatabase.)
Anonymous (1995a) A Bridge too far Management Accounting 73 (1) p 37. (Retrieved: 26 July 2006fromABI/INFORMGlobaldatabase.)
Anonymous (1995b) AICPA seeks standards overload remedy. Journal of Accountancy, 179 (6) pp 100-101. (Retrieved: 26 July 2006 from ABI/INFORM Global database.)
Anonymous (1995c) FASB begins search for answers to standards overload. The CPA Journal, 65 (9) p 9. (Retrieved: 26 July 2006 from ABI/INFORM Global database.)
Ball, R. and Brown, S. (1968) An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal ofAccountingResearch,6(2)pp159-178.
Beaver, W. (1968) The information content of annual earnings announcements. Journal of Accounting Research (Supplement), pp 67-92.
Benis, M. (1978) Rational small business exceptions to FASB rules. The CPA Journal, 48 (2) pp 33-37.
Berenbeim, R. (2002) Enron's syllabus of errors. The Executive Speaker, 16 (6) pp 28-32. (Retrieved: 26 August 2004 from ABI/INFORM Global database.)
Bruce, R. (2002) The way of quiet reform: Old-fashioned techniques should be employed to connect people with their responsibilities and allow steady progress. Financial Times, 29 August p 10.
Callaway, J. (1994) Framework for differential reporting - Addressing overload. TheAccountants' Journal, 73 (3) pp 19-21.
Campbell, J. and Rainsbury, E. (1995) Differential reporting. Chartered Accountants Journal of New Zealand, 74 (11) pp 40-42.
Charles, E. and Murphy, T. (2002) Bad company. Australian CPA, 72 (7) pp 28-33. (Retrieved: 4 September 2006 from ABI/INFORM Global database.)
Clarke, T. (2004) Cycles of crisis and regulation: The enduring agency and stewardship problems of corporate governance. Corporate Governance, 12 (2) pp 153-161.
Clarke, F., Dean, G. and Oliver, K. (2003) Corporate Collapse Accounting, Regulatory and Ethical Failure.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Craig, R. (2002) A case of accounting overkill? Australian CPA, 72 (3) pp 46-47.
DuPree, J. (1985) Users' preferences for descriptive v. technical accounting terms. Accounting and Business Research, 15 (60) pp 281-290.
Estey, N. (2004) Promises enlightened. CA Magazine, 137 (5) pp 51-53. (Retrieved: 25 April 2006 from ABI/INFORM Global database.)
Fraser, I. and Nobes, C. (1985) The assumed users in three accounting theories. Accounting and Business Research, 15 (58) pp 144-147.
Friedlob, G. and Plewa, F.J. Jr. (1984) Small business. Management Accounting, 66 (4) pp 12-15. (Retrieved: 27 July 2006 from ABI/INFORM Global database.)
Greer, L. and Tonge, A. (2006) Ethical foundations: A new framework for reliable financial reporting. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15 (3) pp 259-270.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2006 The journal of contemporary issues in business and government
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b52d/0b52d46edc111e449a0fbf055f579b35f69999ca" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.