Gender Occupational Segregation in Haryana: A District Level Analysis Based on National Classification of Occupations
Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government,
2021, Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 2843-2850
AbstractThis paper analyses Gender occupational segregation in Haryana using census data for National classification of occupations for 2001 and 2011. The value of Duncan’s index of dissimilarity shows that during 2001 and 2011, segregation has declined in Haryana. Both At aggregate level and at sectoral level. It declined for total, main and marginal workers in rural sector. However, in urban sector Gender occupational segregation declined for total and main workers and increased for marginal workers. Our results show that segregation is higher among main workers in rural sector and marginal workers in Urban sector. Also, segregation is higher in urban sector as compared to rural sector. Our results also show that segregation is higher among districts of Mewat, Mahendergarh and Rewari which are socially backward and is least among developed districts of Panchkula, Panipat, Gurgaon and Karnal.
- Agrawal T (2016). “Occupational Segregation in the Indian Labour Market”, The European Journal of Development Research 28: 330-351.
- Agrawal T, Agrawal A (2015). “Trends in occupational gender segregation in India”, International Journal of Gender Studies in Developing Societies 1: 4-24. 15.
- Anker R (1998). “Gender and jobs: Sex segregation of occupations in the world”, International Labour Organization. (ILO) Geneva.
- Arrow, Kenneth, (1973). “Higher education as a filter, Journal of Public Economics”, 2, issue 3, pp. 193-216,
- Badgett, M.V.L.; Folbre, N. (1999). “Assigning care: Gender norms and economic outcomes”, International Labour Review, Vol. 138, No. 3, pp. 311–326
- Barron, R. D. and G. M. Norris (1976). “Sexual Divisions and the Dual Labour Market.” Pp. 47-69 in Dependence and Exploitation in Work and Marriage, edited by Diana Leonard Barker and Sheila Allen. London: Longman
- Becker, Gary S, (1971).“The Economics of Discrimination”, 2nd ed. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
- Bergmann, Barbara, (1974). “Occupational Segregation, Wages and Profits When Employers Discriminate by Race or Sex”, Eastern Economic Journal, 1, issue 2, pp. 103-110,
- Chattopadhyay, M. and S. Chakraborty R. Anker (2013). “Sex Segregation in India's Formal Manufacturing Sector”, International Labour Review, 152 (1), 43-58.
- Crompton, R. & Sanderson, K. (1990). “Gendered Jobs and Social Change”, London: Unwin Hyman
- Das, M.B.; Desai, S. (2003). “Why are educated women less likely to be employed in India? Testing competing hypotheses, Social Protection” Discussion Paper Series, No. 313, Washington DC: World Bank.
- Desai, S.; Jain, D. (1994). “Maternal employment and changes in family dynamics: The social context of women’s work in rural South India”, Population and Development Review, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 115– 136.
- Duncan, O.D. and Duncan, B. (1955). “A Methodological Analysis of Segregation Indices”, American Sociological Review, 20: 210-217
- Edgeworth, F.Y. (1922). “Equal pay to men and women for equal work” Economic Journal 32 (128): 431-457
- Emerek Ruth, Hugo Figueiredo, Pilar González, Lena Gonäs and Jill Rubery (2003). “Indicators on Gender Segregation” https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6379134.pdf accessed on 22 April2021
- England, Paula & Chassie, M & McCormack, Linda. (1982). “Skill Demands and Earnings in Female and Male Occupations”, Sociology and Social Research. 66. Pp.147-168.
- Figart, Deborah, (2005). “Gender as more than a dummy variable: Feminist approaches to discrimination”, Review of Social Economy, 63, issue 3, p. 509-536
- Goldin, Gerald. (2002). “Representation in Mathematical Learning and Problem Solving”. Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education, Lawrence Erlbaum. 197-218.
- Hartman, H. (1979). Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case for Socialist Feminism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
- Jaeger, U. (2010). “Working or stay-at-home mum? The influence of family benefits and religiosity”, Working Paper No. 84 (Munich, Ifo Institute, Leibniz institute for Economic Research, University of Munich)
- Karmel, T. and Maclachlan, M. (1988). “Occupational Sex Segregation - Increasing or Decreasing”, Economic Record 64, 187-95.
- Moir H. and Selby Smith J. (1979). “Industrial segregation in the Australian labour market”, Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol 21, pp. 281-362.
- Panda, P.K. (1999). “Poverty and young women’s employment: Linkages in Kerala”, Working Paper (Thiruvananthapuram, Centre for Development Studies).
- Phillips, A. and B. Taylor (1980). “Sex and skills: notes towards a feminist economics” Feminist Review Vol. 6: 79-88
- Polachek, Solomon, (1981). “Occupational Self-Selection: A Human Capital Approach to Sex Differences in Occupational Structure”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 63, issue 1, pp. 60-69.
- Reskin, Barbara &Bielby, Denise. (2005). “A Sociological Perspective on Gender and Career Outcomes”, Journal of Economic Perspectives. 19.pp. 71-86.
- Rosen, Sherwin. (1986). “The Theory of Equalizing Differences”, Handbook of Labor Economics.
- Rubery, Jill, (1978). “Structured Labour Markets, Worker Organisation and Low Pay”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2, issue 1, pp. 17-36
- .Treiman, D.J. and H.I. Hartmann (eds). (1981). “Women, Work and Wages: Equal Pay for Jobs of Equal Value”, Washington DC: National Academy Press.
- Uppal Anupama (2008). “Occupational Sex Segregation in the Unorganised Manufacturing Sector”, Review of Development and Change 13 (2)
- Article View: 40
- PDF Download: 39