Document Type : Research Article


1 Assistant Professor, Programme of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Assam down town University,

2 Professor, Department of Psychology, Gauhati University, Guwahati, Assam,


Creativity has been acknowledged as one of the predominant factors influencing individual’s contribution in various domains of life. History shows, that creative people possess unusual traits which make them different from their less creative counterparts. The present study was carried out on a group of reputed creative persons (national award winners) in the field of performing arts, visual arts and  innovators in the area of science and technology. The total sample size is 180 (50 performing artists, 50 visual artists, 30 innovators, and 50 corporate executives which constituted the control group)  aged  between 30-65 years. For this purpose Standard Progressive Matrices developed by Ravens (1996) was used for screening purpose, in addition to  the NEO-FFI-3 (Costa and McCrae, 1992) which was used to assess the Big 5 personality areas of openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness and neuroticism. To achieve the objectives Mean, SD, Kruskal Wallis ‘H’ test followed by Maan-Whitney ‘U’testwere the statistical tests used. Finally discriminant analysis was applied to strengthen the predictive validity of the test.  Results yielded that out of the three creative groups, innovators were found to have a significantly higher mean value on openness to experience and conscientiousness, performing artists were found to have a significantly higher score on extraversion and agreeableness while visual artists were found to score high on neuroticism. Finally, openness to experience was found to be the most discriminating factor between the creative and the less creative (corporate executives).


Main Subjects

  1. Allport, G.W. (1961). Pattern and Growth of Personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart &Winston.
  2. Averill, J.R., (1999). Creativity in the domain of emotion. In T. Dalglesigh& M. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion, West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp 765-78.
  3. Batey, M., &Furnham, A. (2008). The relationship between measures of creativity and schizotypy.Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 816–821.
  4. Batey, M., &Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, General and SocialPsychology Monographs,132, 355–429.
  5. Buchanan, D. R., & Bandy, C. (1984). Jungian typology of prospective psychodramatists: Myers-Briggs Type Indicator analysis of applicants for psychodrama training. Psychological Reports, 55, 599-606.
  6. Burch, G.S., Pavelis, C., Hemsley, D.R., &Corr, P.J. (2006). Schizotypy and creativity in visual artists. Br J Psychol. 97(2), 177-90.
  7. Carne, G. C., &Kirton, M. J. (1982). Styles of creativity: Test-score correlations betweenKirton Adaption-Innovation Inventory and Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Psychological Reports, 50, 31-36.
  8. Chamorro, T., Premuzic.,Furnham, A., Ackerman P.L. (2005). Ability and personality correlates of general knowledge. Personality and IndividualDifferences, 41, 419-429.
  9. Dudek, S.Z., Berneche, R., Berube, H., & Royer, S. (1991). Personality determinants of the commitment to the profession of art. Creativity ResearchJournal, 4, 367-389.
  10. Eysenck, H.J. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Fauteux, K. (1995). Beyond Unity. Religious experience, creativity and psychology .Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 14 (1), 58-65.
  12. Feist, G.J. (1998). A meta- analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290-309.
  13. Feist, G. (1993). A structural model of scientific eminence. PsychologicalScience,4(6), 366-371.
  14. Furnham, A. (1999). Personality and creativity. Perceptual and Motor Skills,88, 407-408.
  15. Goerge, J.M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behaviour. An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (3), 513-524.
  16. Helson, R., Agronick ,G. & Roberts, B. (1995). Enduringness and change in creative personality and the prediction of occupational creativity. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 69 (6), 1173-1183.
  17. Kemp, A. E., (1996). The musical temperament: Psychology personality ofmusicians. Oxford University Press, Oxford England, 203
  18.   King, L. K., Walker, L. M., & Broyles, S. J. (1996). Creativity and the fivefactor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 189-203.
  19. McCann, S.J., (2011). Florida Creativity Index Scores, Conservatism, and Openness in 266 US Regions. Psychological Reports, 108 (1), 104-108.
  20. Ohnmacht, F. W. (1970). Personality and cognitive referents of creativity: A second look.Psychological Reports, 26, 336-338
  21. Roy, D. D. (1996). Personality model of fine artists. Creativity ResearchJournal, 9(4), 391-394.
  22. Starko, A.J. (2005). Creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight, New York: Longman.
  23. Torrance, E. P. (1966). Rationale of the Torrance tests of creative thinking ability. In E. P. Torrance & W. F. White (Eds.), Issues and advances ineducation and psychology. Istica, IL: F. E. Peacock.
  24. Yesil, S., &Sozbilir, F. (2013). An Empirical Investigation into the Impact of Personality on Individual Innovation Behaviour in the Workplace. Journal ofSocial and Behavioural Sciences, 81, 540-551.