Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government


Print ISSN: 2204-1990

Online ISSN: 1323-6903

Volume27, Issue3

Influence of Gender Characteristic on Transformation of The Adult Identity

Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 2021, Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 515-522
10.47750/cibg.2021.27.03.070

Abstract

The article presents the results of an empirical study aimed at identifying the influence of gender characteristics on transformation of the adult identity. It was revealed that identity is directly connected with gender characteristics of personality. It was found that gender characteristics, as well as sex, age, marital status and education have the most profound impact on the specificity of the transformation of adult identity. Criteria and specificity of crisis identity of the adult personality are considered. Criteria and specifics of the crisis identity of an adult are also examined.
Keywords:
Main Subjects:

  1. Andronnikova, O.O., Veterok, E.V. (2017). “Gender characteristics of victim behavior as a result of violation of social development”. Psychological Sciences, no. 3(57), pp. 111-113.
  2. Bem, S. (2004). The Lenses of gender: transforming the debate on sexual inequality. Moscow: “Russian political encyclopedia”.
  3. Boer, J. (2008). “Collective intention, social identity, and rational choice”. J. Econ. Methodol., no. 15(2), pp. 169-184. DOI: 10.1080/13501780801919139
  4. Boulu-Reshef, B. (2015). “Toward a Personal Identity Argument to Combine Potentially Conflicting Social Identities”. Rev Soc Econ., no.  73(1), pp. 1-18. DOI: 10.1080/00346764.2014.990745
  5. Bruner, M.W., Balish, Sh.M., Forrest, Ch., Brown, S., Webber, K., Gray, E., McGuckin, M., Keats, M.R., Rehman, L., Shields, Ch.A. (2017). “Ties That Bond: Youth Sport as a Vehicle for Social Identity and Positive Youth Development”. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport., no. 88 (2), pp. 209-214. DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2017.1296100
  6. Bublik, M.M. (2013). “Semantic space ethnic identity of the youth: gender aspect”. Vestnik SamGU, no. 2(103), pp. 181-187.
  7. Erickson, E. (2006). Identity: youth and crisis. Moscow: Flint.
  8. Gillett, G.R. (2009). “The Subjective Brain, Identity, and Neuroethics”. Am. J. Bioeth., no. 9(9), pp. 5-13. DOI: 10.1080/15265160903090058
  9. Gómez, Á., Vázquez, A. (2015). “Personal identity and social identity: two different processes or a single one? Identidad personal e identidad social. Dos procesos diferentes o uno solo?”. Revista de Psicología Social, no. 30(3), pp. 468-480. DOI: 10.1080/02134748.2015.1065091
  10. Gulina, N.R., Dmitrieva, N.V., Savelyev, D.I. (2010). Gender peculiarities of the crisis of identity of the person. Vestnik of Chelyabinsk state pedagogical University, no. 1, pp. 58-70.
  11. Hoch, N.S. (2011). “To build a system model of gender identity”. Bulletin of TSPU, no. 6, pp. 181-187.
  12. Hohman, Z.P., Dahl, E., Grubbs, S. (2016). “Entitativity and social identity complexity: The relationship between group characteristics and personal characteristics on group identification”. Self and Identity, no. 15(6), pp. 638-649. DOI: 10.1080/15298868.2016.1185462
  13. Jongman-Sereno, K.P., Leary, M.R. (2018). “Self-judgments of authenticity”. Self and Identity. DOI: 10.1080/15298868.2018.1526109
  14. Klochko, V.E., Lukyanov, O.V. (2009). “Personal identity and the problem of human stability in a changing world: a systemic anthropological perspective”. Vestnik Tomsk State University, no. 324, pp. 333-336.
  15. Kozlova, E.G. (2015). “Modern understanding of professional identity of the person. Modern researches of social problems”. Electronic journal of the WAC, no. 3, pp. 451-460.
  16. Lawy, R. (2003). “Transformation of Person, Identity and Understanding: A case study”. Br. J. Sociol., no. 24(3), pp. 331-345. DOI: 10.1080/01425690301893
  17. Marcia, J.E. (2002). “Identity and Psychosocial Development in Adulthood”. Identity, no. 2 (1), 7-28. DOI: 10.1207/S1532706XID0201_02
  18. McIntyre, J.C., Worsley, J., Corcoran, Rh., Woods, P.H., Bentall, R.P. (2018). “Academic and non-academic predictors of student psychological distress: the role of social identity and loneliness”. J. Ment. Health., no. 27(3), pp. 230-239. DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2018.1437608
  19. McLean, K.C., Pasupathi, M. (2012). “Processes of Identity Development: Where I Am and How I Got There”. Identity, no. 12(1), pp. 8-28. DOI: 10.1080/15283488.2011.632363
  20. Nario-Redmond, M.R., Biernat, M., Eidelman, S., Palenske, D.J. (2004). “The Social and Personal Identities Scale: A Measure of the Differential Importance Ascribed to Social and Personal Self-Categorizations”. Self and Identity, no. 3 (2), pp. 143-175. DOI: 10.1080/13576500342000103
  21. Panchina, L.V., Fedoseeva, I.A., Andronnikov, O.O., Perevozkina, J.M. (2017). “Gender dimension to the archetypal perception of the modern teacher”. Vestnik of Novosibirsk state pedagogical University, no. 3, pp. 37-52.
  22. Soldatova, E.L. (2007). Structure and dynamics of normative crisis of transition to adulthood: monograph. Chelyabinsk: SUSU Publishing house.
  23. Tavitian-Elmadjian, L., Bender, M., Van de Vijver, F.J.R., Chasiotis, A., Harb, C. (2019). “Autobiographical recall of mastery experiences is a mechanism of self-affirming under social identity threat”. J. Soc. Psychol. DOI: 10.1080/00224545.2019.1606775
  24. Torgrimson, B.N., Minson, C.T. (2005). “Sex and Gender: What Is the Difference?” Journal of Applied Physiology, no. 99(3), pp. 785-787. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00376.2005
  25. Tuguz, Z.Y. (2015). “Socio-cultural aspects of the development of gender theory”. Bulletin of the Maykop State Technological University, no. 3, pp. 173-178.
  26. Voci, A. (2000). “Perceived Group Variability and the Salience of Personal and Social Identity”. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol., no. 11(1), pp. 177-221. DOI: 10.1080/14792772043000031
  27. Wagoner, J.A., Belavadi, S., Jung, J. (2017). “Social identity uncertainty: Conceptualization, measurement, and construct validity”. Self and Identity, no. 16(5), pp. 505-530. DOI: 10.1080/15298868.2016.1275762
  28. Zomeren, M., Kutlaca, M., Turner-Zwinkels, F. (2018). “Integrating who «we» are with what «we» (will not) stand for: A further extension of the Social Identity Model of Collective Action”. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol., no. 29(1), pp. 122-160. DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2018.1479

  • Article View: 178
  • PDF Download: 109
Journal Information

Publisher: Society of Business and management

Email:  chiefeditor.cibg@gmail.com