Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government


Print ISSN: 2204-1990

Online ISSN: 1323-6903

Volume27, Issue3

Reasons behind low achievement in English language for Tawjihi students and suggested remedies

Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 2021, Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 462-471
10.47750/cibg.2021.27.03.064

Abstract

This study aimed at investigating the reasons for the English low achievement level among the second secondary students in Qabatya district schools, and suggested remedies tackling this weakness.
The questions of the research were:
-          Who stood behind the low achievement in English language that faces Tawjihi students as perceived by English teachers and students in Qabatya district (teacher or student)?
-          Were there any significant differences in Reasons behind low achievement in English language for Tawjihi students as perceived by the teachers due to (gender, qualification and experience)?
-          Were there any significant differences in Reasons behind low achievement in English language for Tawjihi students as perceived by the students due to (gender and stream)?
In order to fulfill the objectives of this study; the researcher used a cross-sectional design based on questionnaires distributed. 63 questionnaire items were set to identify the reasons for the low English achievement level among the secondary school students in Qabatya district. This study targeted English language teachers and Tawjihi students in Qabatya district to measure Reasons behind low achievement in English language scores for Tawjihi students and suggested remedies.
The results of the questionnaire showed that:
- Teachers thought that the main reason for low achievement in English language according to the items in the teacher questionnaire are related to “Students not well constructed in English language from the beginning”. This item received an 89.33% of the English language teachers’ agreement.
In addition, teachers considered English language classes’ quantity is not enough as a second main reason for low achievement for Tawjihi students. This statement received 89.63%.
Other important factors for low achievement which also received a high degree of agreement include “Students only care to pass the Tawjihi English exam” and “Students dislike English language”.
On the other hand, Tawjihi students that their low achievement in English is because their Parents ignore their low grades in English, the teachers lack proficiency and Teachers mostly use mother tongue in the class.  These Were the most important reasons for their low achievement.
There were no statistically significant differences in means that at (p value = 0.05) in Reasons behind low achievement in English language for Tawjihi students due to academic qualification for the teachers, experience and gender.
There were no statistically significant differences in means that at (p value = 0.05) in Reasons behind low achievement in English language for Tawjihi students from Tawjihi students perceptive   due to stream and gender.
The researcher suggested an instructional program for tackling this weakness and gives relevant recommendations.
The most significant were:
-          English language teachers should attend training courses before entering the class for the first time.
-          It is strongly recommended that low achieving students should attend classes away from others with different content material.
-          Schools should be fixed to suit the curriculum demands and the students’ age challenges.???
-          It is necessary to add two more English periods to the weekly English periods.
Keywords:
Main Subjects:

  1. Abdel Aziz, M. (2005) Difficulties of Teaching English  Language in Governmental Schools as Perceived by English  teachers, Un published research, Al Imam Mohammed Bin Soud Islamic University.
  2. Alkhuli, M. (2000) Teaching English as Foreign Language, Jordan.
  3. Alkilani, T.  and Maqutash, L. (2002) ELT. Alquds Open University,.Jordan.
  4. Beck, I.& McKeown, M. (2009). Effects of Long-Term Vocabulary Instruction on Lexical Access and achievement in English language Comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology.
  5. Bell, T. (2001, April). Extensive achievement in English language: SpeedandComprehension. The achievement in English language Matrix, 1. Retrieved November 2002 from
  6. Birsh & Judith, R. (2005). "Research and achievement in English language Disability". In Judith R. Birsh. Multisensory Teaching of Basic Language Skills. Baltimore, Maryland: Paul H. Brookes Publishing. p. 8.
  7. Brookover, W. B., Schweitzer, J. H., Schneider, J. M., Beady, C. H., Flood, P. K., & Wisenbaker, J. M. (1978). Elementary School Social Climate and School Achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 15(2), 301–318. doi:10.3102/00028312015002301
  8. Callahan, R. M. (2005). Tracking and High School English Learners: Limiting Opportunity to Learn. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 305–328. doi:10.3102/00028312042002305
  9. Carbonaro, W. J., & Gamoran, A. (2002). The Production of Achievement Inequality in High School English. American Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 801–827. doi:10.3102/00028312039004801
  10. Catts & Hogan, I (2003) Cognitive processes in early achievement in English language development: Accommodating individual differences into a model
  11. Commeyrars, M.  and Inyega, H.N. (2007), achievement in English language Research Quarterly, Vol.47. No. 2: International achievement in English language Association.Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Publishers.
  12. Donnell, M. &, Wood, M. (1999). Becoming a Reader: A Developmental Approach to achievement in English language Instructions. MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  13. Foorman, B. R., & Torgesen, J. (2001). Critical Elements of Classroom and Small Group Instruction Promote achievement in English language Success in all Children. Learning Disabilities.
  14. Gersten, R., & Geva, E. (2003). Teaching achievement in English language to Early Language Learners. Educational Leadership, 60(7), 44-49.
  15. Gottardo, A. (2002). The Relationship Between Language and achievement in English language Skills in Bilingual Spanish- English Speakers. Topics in Language Disorders, 22, 46–70.
  16. Halle, T. G., Kurtz-Costes, B., & Mahoney, J. L. (1997). Family influences on school achievement in low-income, African American children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 527–537. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.527
  17. http://www. achievement in English languagematrix. com/articles/bell/Issa, M. (2006) Weakness in achievement in English language and learning methods, Al Eskanderia.
  18. Keith, T. Z., Reimers, T. M., Fehrmann, P. G., Pottebaum, S. M., & Aubey, L. W. (1986). Parental involvement, homework, and TV time: Direct and indirect effects on high school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(5), 373–380. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.78.5.373
  19. Kibby M. Y., & Hynd, G. W. (2001). Neurobiological Basis of learning Disabilities. In D. P.multicultural setting. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the English teachers of English to speakers of other languages of acquisition. Issues in Education, 1, 1–57.
  20. Liow, S.J.R. and Lau, L.H.S. (2006), The Development of Bilingual Children’s Early Spelling in English: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol.98 No. 4. 868-878.
  21. Lundberg, I., & Hoien, T. (2001). Dyslexia and Phonolgy. In A. J. Fawcett (Ed.), Dyslexia: Theory and Good Practice. Philadelphia: Whurr Publishers.
  22. Manis, F., Lindsey, K., & Bailey, C. (2004). Development of achievement in English language in Grades K-2 in Spanish Speaking English -Language Learners. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice.
  23. Paris, S.G. (2005), Reinterpreting the Development of achievement in English language Skills, achievement in English language Research Quarterly, Vol.40 No.2 April/May/June 2005.
  24. Puolakanoha, A.,Ahonen,T.,Aro,M., Eklund, K. Leppänen,P.H.T., Poikkeus, A.M., Talvanen, A. Torppa, M.. and Lyytinen, H. (2008), Developmental Links of Very Early Phonological and language Skills to second Grade achievement in English language Outcomes, Strong to Accuracy but Only Minor to Fluency, Journal of Learning Disabilities.
  25. Rasinsky, T. V. (2004). A focus on communication with parents and families. (PP. 159-166). Newyork.
  26. Rohmer, T. (1997, August). Basic English Spelling: An Improved System of Spelling, written as it Sounds, pronounced as it is Written. Winnetka, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED316870).
  27. Savage, R., Pillay, V.and Melidona, S. (2008), Rapid Serial Naming is a Unique Predictor of Spelling in Children, Journal of Learning Disability.The achievement in English language Matrix, 1. Retrieved November 2002.
  28. Saville-Troike, M. (1984). What Really Matters in Second Language Learning for Academic Achievement? TESOL Quarterly, 18(2), 199–219. doi:10.2307/3586690
  29. Smith, F. (1994). Understanding achievement in English language. A Psycholinguistic Analysis of achievement in English language and Learning to Read. (Fifth Edition). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  30. Terepocki, M., Kruk, R. S., Willows, D. M. (2002). The Incidence and Nature of Letter Orientation Errors in achievement in English language Disability.approach to achievement in English language instructions. MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  31. Wimmer, H.  (2010), Learning to Read German: Normal and Impaired Acquisition. In M. Harris & G. Hatano (Eds.), Learning to read and write: A cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 34–50). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  32. Ziegler, J.C. and Goswani, U. (2005), Psychology Bulletin, 131 (1) 3 29, American Psychology Association.

 

  • Article View: 272
  • PDF Download: 205
Journal Information

Publisher: Society of Business and management

Email:  chiefeditor.cibg@gmail.com