Fraud risk as perceived by external auditors: Evidence from Tunisia
Keywords:
Fraud risk, risk assessment, audit planning, TunisiaAbstract
Purpose - This study aims to explore the Tunisian external auditors’ perception of fraud risk, the process of fraud risk assessment and their responses to it.
Design - Through a qualitative study, the analysis draws on a total of 20 semi-structured interviews conducted with auditors from Big 4 and Non-Big 4 audit firms.
Findings - The results demonstrate the importance given to fraud risk and reveal some ambiguities encountered during the audit engagement regarding this risk. They also highlight the necessity of exercising professional judgment and skepticism.
Research limitations - Even though audit planning involves the nature, extent, and timing of audit procedures, the present work did not take their efficiency into consideration.
Practical implications - Highlighting ambiguities and raising concerns about auditors’ responsibilities regarding fraud risk may interest standard setters and audit firms as they both strive to improve the ability of auditors to identify fraud risk and to respond to it appropriately.
Originality/value - Our investigation allows auditors to speak up about their concerns regarding fraud risk and their ability to address it. Interviews were used to deepen our knowledge about this issue within an emerging country, Tunisia.
References
Aghghaleh, S.F., Mohamed, Z.M. and Rahmat, M.M. (2016), “Detecting financial statement frauds in Malaysia: comparing the abilities of Beneish and Dechow Models”, Asian Journal of Accounting and Governance, Vol. 7, pp.57-65.
AICPA. (1997), Statements on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 82: Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, New York, NY. Akrout, O. and Damak-Ayadi, S. (2021), “Intention to leave public accounting profession in Tunisia: a qualitative study”, Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, Advance online publication, doi: 10.1108/JAEE-08-2019-0160.
Asare, S. K. and Wright, A. M. (2004), “The effectiveness of alternative risk assessment and program planning tools in a fraud setting”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol 21 No.2, pp.325-352.
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACEF). (2020), “Report to the Nations. On Occupational Fraud and Abuse”, available at: https://acfepublic.s3-us-west- 2.amazonaws.com/2020-Report-to-the-Nations.pdf (accessed 25 June 2018).
Bauer, T. D., Hillison, S. M., Peecher, M. E., and Pomeroy, B. (2020), “Revising audit plans to address fraud risk: a case of “Do as I advise, not as I do”?”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 37 No. 4, pp.2558-2589.
Bedard, J.C., Simnett, R. and DeVoe-Talluto, J.A. (2001), “ Auditors' consideration of fraud: How behavioral research can address the concerns of standard setters”, Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, Vol. 4, pp.77–101.
Brinkmann, S. (2008), “Interviewing”, Given, L.M. (Ed.), The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, SAGE Publications, pp.470-472.
Carpenter, T. (2007), “Audit Team Brainstorming, Fraud Risk Identification, and Fraud Risk Assessment: implications of SAS No. 99”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 82 No. 5, pp.1119- 1140.
Chui, L. and Pike, B. (2013), “Auditors' responsibility for fraud detection: New wine in old bottles?”, Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp.203-233.
Cormier, D. and Lapointe-Antunes, P. (2006), “The auditor's assessment and detection of corporate fraud: some Canadian evidence”, International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp.133–165.
Cressey, D. R. (1950), “The criminal violation of financial trust”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 15 No. 6, pp.738-743.
Cressey, D. R. (1953), Other People’s Money: the Social Psychology of Embezzlement, The Free Press, New York.
Creswell, J.W. and Creswell, J.D. (2018), Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (Fifth Edition), SAGE Publications, Los Angeles.
Boyle, D.M., DeZoort, F.T. and Hermanson, D.R. (2015), “The effect of alternative fraud model use on auditors’ fraud risk judgments”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 34 No. 6, pp.578-596.
Ennar, H., Damak-Ayadi, S. (2017), “Risque de fraude et performance de l’auditeur: étude de perception”, paper presented at the 2nd Edition of the LIGUE International Conference, 26 October, ISCAE Manouba.
Favere-Marchesi, M. (2013), “Effects of Decomposition and Categorization on Fraud-Risk Assessments”. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp.201–219.
Fay, J. R., Jenkins, J. G. and Popova, V. (2015), “Effects of awareness of prior-year testing strategies and engagement risk on audit decisions.” Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp.226-243.
Festinger, L. (1957), A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Stanford University Press, Stanford. Festinger, L. (1962), “Cognitive Dissonance”, Scientific American, Vol. 207 No. 4, pp.93- 106.
Fitri, F.A., Syukur, M. and Justisa, G. (2019), “Do the Fraud Triangle Components Motivate Fraud In Indonesia?”, Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, Vol. 13 No. 4, pp.63-72.
Fortvingler, J. and Szívós, L. (2016), “Different Approaches to Fraud Risk Assessment and Their Implications on Audit Planning.” Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp.102-112.
Gendron, Y. and Spira, L.F. (2009), “What went wrong? The downfall of Arthur Andersen and the construction of controllability boundaries surrounding financial auditing”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 987-1027.
Glover, S. M., Prawitt, D. F., Schultz, Jr., J. J. and Zimbelman. M. (2003), “A test of changes in auditors’ fraud-related planning judgments since the issuance of SAS No. 82”. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp.237-251.
Guest, G., Bunce, A. and Johnson, L. (2006), “How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability”, Field methods, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp.59–82.
Hammersley, J. S. (2011), “A review model of auditor judgements in fraud- related planning tasks”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp.101-128.
Hammersley, J. S., Bamber, E. M. and Carpenter, T. D. (2010), “The influence of documentation specificity and priming on auditors' fraud risk assessments and evidence evaluation decisions”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 85 No. 2, pp.547-571.
Hammersley, J. S., Johnstone, K. and Kadous, K. (2011). “How do audit seniors respond to heightened fraud risk?”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp.81-101. Hentati-Klila, I., Dammak-Barkallah, S. and Affes, H. (2016), “Do auditors’ perceptions actually help fight against fraudulent practices?”, Evidence from Tunisia, Journal of Management & Governance, pp.1–21.
Hogan, C. E., Rezaee, Z., Riley, R. A. and Velury, U. K. (2008), “Financial Statement Fraud: Insights from The Academic Literature”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp.231-252.
Holm, C., Langsted, L. B. and Seehausen, J. (2012). “Establishing Proactive Auditor Responsibilities in Relation to Fraud: the Role of the Courts and Professional Bodies in Denmark”. International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 79–97.
Hopwood, A.G. (1998), “Exploring the modern audit firm: an introduction”,
Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 23 Nos 5/6, pp.515-516.
Humphrey, C. (2008), “Auditing research: a review across the disciplinary divide”,
Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 170-203.
Hurtt, R. K. (2010), “Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice &Theory Vol. 29 No. 1, pp.149-171.
IAASB. (2014), Handbook of International Quality Control, Auditing, Review, Other Assurance, and Related Services Pronouncements (volume 1), International Federation of Accountants, New York.
Kassem, R. (2014), “Detecting asset misappropriation: a framework for external auditors. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp.1–41.
Khelil, I., Hussainey, K. and Noubbigh, H. (2016), “Audit committee–Internal audit interaction and moral courage”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 31, Nos. 4/5, pp.403-433. Khelil, I., Hussainey, K. and Noubbigh, H. (2018), “Chief audit executives' perceptions of drivers of moral courage: Tunisian evidence”, International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp.315–.337
Kiymaz, H. (2020), "Types of Corporate Fraud", Baker, H.K., Purda-Heeler,
L. and Saadi, S. (Ed.), Corporate Fraud Exposed, Emerald Publishing Limited , Bingley, pp.19-38.
Knapp, C. A. and Knapp, M. C. (2001), “The effects of experience and explicit fraud risk assessment in detecting fraud with analytical procedures”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 25–37.
Lokanan, M. E. (2015), “Challenges to the fraud triangle: Questions on its usefulness”,
Accounting Forum, vol. 39. No. 3, pp.201-224.
Mack, N., Woodsong, C., Macqueen, K.M., Guest, G. and Namey, E. (2005), Qualitative Research Methods: A Data Collector’s Field Guide , Family Health International, North Carolina.
Mangala, D. and Kumari, P. (2017), “Auditors’ Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Fraud Prevention and Detection Methods”, Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp.118–142.
Maulidi, A. (2020), “Critiques and further directions for fraud studies”, Journal of Financial Crime, Vol. 27 No. 2, pp.323–335
Merriam, S.B. and Tisdell, E.J. (2016), Qualitative Research: a Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
Miledi, A. (2021), “The construction of audit partner’s judgment”, Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Advance online publication, doi:10.1108/JFRA-03- 2020-0087.
Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. (1994), Qualitative Data Analysis: an Expanded Sourcebook, Sage Publications, Oxford.
Mock, T. J., Srivastava, R. P. and Wright, A. M. (2017), “Fraud risk assessment using the Fraud Risk Model as a decision aid”, Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, Vol.14 No. 1, pp.37-56.
Mohd-Sanusi, Z. Khalid, N.H., and Mahir, A. (2015), “An Evaluation of Clients’ Fraud Reasoning Motives in Assessing Fraud Risks: from the Perspective of External and Internal Auditors”, Procedia Economics and Finance, Vol. 31, pp.2–12.
Montesdeoca, M.R., Agustín J. S. M. and Santana, F.B. (2019), “Research Topics in Accounting Fraud in the 21st Century: A State of the Art”, Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 6), pp.1-31.
Mubako, G. and O'Donnell, E. (2018), “Effect of fraud risk assessments on auditor skepticism: unintended consequences on evidence evaluation”, International Journal of Auditing, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp.55-64.
Olsen, C. and Gold, A. (2018), “Future research directions at the intersection between cognitive neuroscience research and auditors’ professional skepticism”, Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 41, pp.127-141.
Parker, L.D. (2003), “Qualitative research in accounting and management: the emerging agenda”, Journal of Accounting and Finance, Vol.2, pp.15-30.
Patton, M.Q. (2015), Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: integrating Theory and Practice (4th ed.), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (2005), “Language and meaning: data collection in qualitative research”,
Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 137–145.
Popova, V. (2018), “Integration of Fraud Risk in the Risk of Material Misstatement and the Effect on Auditors' Planning Decisions”, Journal of Forensic Accounting Research, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp.52-79.
Power, M. (2003), “Auditing and the production of legitimacy”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 28 No. 4, pp.379-394.
Power, M. (2013), “The apparatus of fraud risk”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 38 Nos. 6-7, pp.525–543.
Ross, L. M. and Squires, G. D. (2011), “The Personal Costs of Subprime Lending and the Foreclosure Crisis: A Matter of Trust, Insecurity, and Institutional Deception”, Social Science Quarterly, Vol. 92, No. 1, pp.140–163.
Skærbæk, P. (2009), “Audit office of Denmark as independent auditor and modernizer”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 34 No. 8, pp.971-987.
Tang, J. and Karim, K.E. (2019), “Financial fraud detection and big data analytics – implications on auditors’ use of fraud brainstorming session”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp.324-337
Trotman, K. T. and Wright. W.T. (2012), “Triangulation of audit evidence in fraud risk assessments”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp.41-53.
Vousinas, G. L. (2019), “Advancing theory of fraud: The S.C.O.R.E. Model”, Journal of Financial Crime, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 372-381.
Wilks, J. and Zimbelman, M. (2004), “Decomposition of fraud-risk assessments and auditors’ sensitivity to fraud cues”, Contemporary Accounting Research, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp.719–749.
Zimbelman, M. F. (1997), “The effects of SAS No. 82 on auditors’ attention to fraud risk factors and audit planning decisions”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 35 (Supplement), pp.75–97.
Zouari, R (2013), “La révélation des faits délictueux entre obligation et application : cas de la Tunisie”, paper presented at the the Frensh connection (Comptabilité sans frontière), May, Canada, available at : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01003933/document (accessed 20 February 2018).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
